You do not give much thought when signing a security cheque. You happily hand it over during loan, tenancy, business supply, credit card settlement, friendly borrowings, dealership, partnership dealing, rent or service agreement. All is well until the cheque is presented and bounces. Suddenly, the drawer gets a legal notice. Suddenly everyone starts talking about “Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act”. Family members worry. Business partners point fingers. Someone says, “But it was only a security cheque. How can someone criminalise it?” Is security cheque bounce criminal case in India? Yes and no. When does a security cheque bounce become a criminal case? Let us explain. Cheques given as security still happen across Delhi NCR, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram, Faridabad, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata, Pune, Ahmedabad, Jaipur, Lucknow and most Indian cities. Our economy survives on trust, post-dated cheques and conditional promises. When a security cheque bounces, it hits your money, reputation and peace of mind together. You may have to deal with court summons, legal notice, settlement calls, travel hassles, business embarrassment and worry about criminal records. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 criminalises cheque dishonour when some statutory conditions are met. The offence triggers if the cheque was issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt or liability. Court may punish with imprisonment for upto two years or fine of upto twice the cheque amount or both. Law helps complainants, and protects accused persons too. For complainants, undue delay can hurt the case. For accused persons, careless reply makes defence difficult later. Precisely why cheque bounce and security cheque matters need a proper factual review right at the beginning. Interested readers can also read Does cheque given as security attract section 138 of NI Act? A cheque given as security becomes a criminal case if there exists a legally enforceable liability on date of cheque presentation. Bank returns must reach the holder with information of cheque dishonour. Payee must send cheque bounce notice within 30 days of receiving bank return. Drawer gets 15 days of receipt of notice to make payment. Defences like no debt was due, cheque was blank, cheque was misused, amount was inflated etc are available. Cheque bounce matters can often settle or compound depending on facts and stage. Legally speaking, a security cheque is a negotiable instrument given to guarantee future repayment, performance, rent, supply, service, loan instalment, credit line or any other obligation. The holder does not present it straight away. It sits in a folder till the holder thinks the time is right to claim that the underlying liability became due. Is security cheque bounce criminal case? If the cheque represents a legally enforceable debt or liability on date of presentation, the answer is yes. Example 1: A borrower gives his lender a cheque when he takes a loan. Later the borrower defaults and lender presents the cheque when the loan amount or instalment becomes due. Will it bounce? Maybe, but Section 138 complaint is a strong possibility. Claiming that this was a “security cheque” alone will not stop the matter. Example 2: A landlord collects a blank cheque as security from a tenant. He fills any amount he likes whenever he wants, without any actual dues or proof. He deposits it and demands payment. Can the tenant defend himself in court? Yes, most likely because the drawer can say that there was no debt or liability due on him. See the difference? For loan and card loan related queries, readers may also visit the service page dedicated to bounced security cheque for loan and credit card disputes. Yes, security cheque bounce can attract section 138 NI Act. If on date of cheque presentation, there exists a legally enforceable debt or liability, the drawer will have to face Section 138 legal consequences. Simply claiming that “it was a security cheque” is not a guaranteed defence in law. The bottom line is that drawer should prove his/her defence based on factual position. Indian courts have repeatedly recognized the fact-sensitive nature of security cheque cases. In the Supreme Court decision Sripati Singh v. State of Jharkhand, the Court held: In another important ruling by SC in Sampelly Satyanarayana Rao v. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd., cheque bounce were filed against post dated cheques issued towards loan amounts. SC treated the matter under Section 138: Courts examine facts. They do not decide a matter just because a party calls it a “security cheque”. Want to learn more about the related issue? Read the full article on Section 138 NI Act for cheque bounce. As explained earlier, the primary law is Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Legal provisions related to this topic come from Sections 138, 139, 142 and other related NI Act procedures. Section 138 makes it offence to dishonour cheque when cheque was issued for discharge of any debt or liability which was legally enforceable. It also stipulates the notice requirement and grace period for payment. Section 139 creates presumption in favour of holder. It assumes that holder received cheque for discharge of debt or liability unless contrary is proved by drawer. Section 142 creates the power to take cognizance of Section 138 complaints. One can file cheque bounce complaint within one month of cause of action. It also decides in which court such complaint can be filed. Need help drafting cheque bounce complaint? Visit Section 138 complaint support. This post is meant for anyone struggling with cheque given as security bounce issue. Borrowers refer this when lender, NBFC, private financier, business supplier or credit party presents their security cheque after dispute. Tenants use this if landlord deposits cheque against rent, damage, lock-in clause, maintenance or refund of security deposit. Business owners get into security cheque matters in supply chains. Distributors often get cheques from retailers. Vendors may receive post-dated cheques from small businesses. Companies can accept cheques from dealers or franchisees. Landlords, suppliers and lenders also require similar advise. A small mistake in notice, incorrect amount or ignorance of documents can destroy genuine claim. On the other hand, drawer who ignores notice may lose valuable opportunity to raise defence. For loan and credit card related security cheque cases, visit guide to bounced security cheques and cards. Presentation of security cheque is the start of any cheque bounce legal action. When cheque is bounced by bank, they issue a return memo with reasons for the same. Common grounds include insufficient funds, account closed, stop payment, signature mismatch or others. After that comes the legal notice. Payee demands payment of cheque amount from drawer. The notice must follow legal format. Sending an incorrect notice can create problems for complainant later. Drawer should not react emotionally or overly polite. Detailed reply should investigate if the due amount was shown correctly, if cheque was blank when handed over, if it was misused by holder, if part payment was made, if agreement support holder’s claim and if notice was received in time. If drawer fails to make payment within prescribed period after receiving notice, complainant can file a Section 138 complaint before Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate Court. Court may issue summons on accused. Evidence matters a lot at this stage. Remember, many cheque bounce cases settle outside courts. During negotiation, many matters settle. Many settled during trial or mediation. Even at appellate stage, many cheque bounce matters settle. But lawyers advise that every settlement must be recorded properly in writing. Want to know what mistakes are commonly made in sending cheque bounce notices? Read legal notice for cheque bounce guide which covers format, time limits and mistakes. Remember any case is won or lost at documents stage. Human memory fails. Paper never does. For complainant, important documents include cheque, bank return memo, account statement copy, loan agreement/receipt, rent agreement, sales invoice, ledger book entries, WhatsApp chat history, email correspondence, acknowledgement of debt, delivery proof, notice and postal receipt. For drawers or accused persons, useful documents are proof of repayment, settlement chats, blank cheque delivery acknowledgment, misuse complaint to bank, bank instructions, contract agreement clause, ledger mismatch, previous emails and demand calculation error. Cheque should not have been issued for enforceable liability. Cheque bounce cases based on security deposits need one more level of fact analysis. Courts may look at rent agreement, property handover note, damage list, pending maintenance bills, refund demand letter and tenant communication at the time of leaving. These documents prove whether bounced cheque was representative of actual dues or not. Read detailed page on security deposit cheque bounce cases if you have pending cheque bounce matter arising out of rent/deposit dispute. Like any criminal law offence, cheque bounce law is extremely timelines driven. Miss one date and your strong case can die. Miss one defence opportunity and genuine case against you can succeed. Cheque must be presented within its validity period. On receiving cheque dishonour bank memo, payee has 30 days to send cheque bounce notice. Drawer gets 15 days of notice receipt to make payment. If he fails to do so, cause of action arises for complaint filing. Court delays differ from city to city. Courts in Delhi NCR take different paths than courts in Lucknow, Jaipur or Delhi. Courts in Mumbai, Pune, Chennai or Kolkata follow their own rhythms too. One practical mistake cheque drawers make is treating notice casually. Sending part payment without clearly documenting that you do not admit full liability is another common mistake. Refer to page on how long cheque bounce case take in India for practical timeline issues. Guilty are those who destroy their own case before meeting a lawyer. They reply to notice angrily over Whatsapp. They accept liability over casual conversations. They throw away bank memo provided by their bank. They ignore legal notice sent by post. They send part payment without asking for a settlement and payment receipt. They don’t keep documents safe for future. Accused persons say, “It was given as security cheque. It is not a debt.” But they show no document to prove their claim. Bad strategy. Even complainants make mistakes. They demand wrong amounts. They send wrongly formatted notice. They present very old cheques without checking liability. They file complain without required proof of debt. Cheque bounce matter are misused by some to run threats through police. Remember, cheque bounce is a complaint based mechanism. Section 138 is not initiated by normal police FIR route, except in rare cases. Accused persons worried about cheque misuse can read this guide on how to keep yourself safe from fake cheque bounce cases. A casually treated cheque bounce notice for security cheque can create big legal and practical headaches. Court complaint can be filed. You may get court summons. Non-appearance will land you in bigger coercive trouble. Your business reputation is at stake. You may get settlement calls. If you ignored notice without sending reply, your defence gets weaker. Even complainant risks his chance if he acts casually. Defective notice, wrong party name, incorrect amount, limitation, proof of debt etc can kill his case. Business owners ignore cheque bounce litigation at their own risk. Vendor relations, smooth credit terms, bank confidence and market reputation get disturbed. For individuals, family faces unnecessary stress and social embarrassment. Rent, salary and security deposit matters require separate discussion based on facts. Read cheated on salary, rent or security deposit and cheque bounce for those cases. Consult a lawyer right away if you receive: Cheque bounce lawyer for security cheque will help you review the matter at earliest. Consulting early saves limitation, defence and settlement opportunities. Lawyer can help you figure out following points: Similarly, consult a lawyer before presenting security cheque to anyone. Many complainants think that once they hold a cheque, case is half won. It is not true. See our guide on can a cheque be traced to learn how paper cheques can be traced. If complaint has been already filed and court process has begun, then strategy changes. Now you need to focus on appearance, bail bond if local practice demands it, your plea, evidence collection, cross examination stage, settlement scope and defending the matter. For basic understanding on complainant side, see who can file cheque bounce case in court. Criminal jurisprudence aims to protect social welfare. Persons who break law face punishment. Section 138 makes cheque bounce offence because lawmakers want to ensure trust in cheque payments. They don’t want people issuing cheques they know cannot be paid. Security cheques get caught in legal trap only when there exists an enforceable liability on date of cheque presentation. Future liability is not the same as legally enforceable liability. If cheque is given to secure future damage to rented flat, landlord will have to prove actual damages when he presents the cheque. However, if cheque is given against loan default and borrower has defaulted, the dynamics change. Court does not believe in documents titles. They look at facts, background and agreement. Read why cheque bounce case is filed under section 138 for detailed analysis. Punishment in security cheque bounce cases depends on facts, bench and judge. Section 138 permits imprisonment upto 2 years, or fine upto twice the cheque amount or both. Many matters settle before judgement is passed. Some go up to trial stage. Some matter go to appeal or revision after conviction. Some high value cases settle via compounding where parties work out cheque amount dispute. No lawyer can guarantee you acquittal, conviction, settlement or quashing. Each case depends on documents and timelines. Cheque bounce matter gets complicated if conviction happens. Need urgent legal help? Visit suspension of sentence in cheque bounce conviction. Yes. Security cheque bounce matter can be defended if facts are favourable. Legitimate defence include – no debt was shown to be due on date of presentation, cheque was blank, cheque was misused by holder, repayment actually happened, wrong amount was demanded, notice was legally defective, limitation cut off cause of action, wrong person got notice,drawer had no authority to issue cheque, underlying contract had conditions not fulfilled etc. Section 139 creates legal presumption in favour of holder. That is why simple denials will not work. Defence should have evidence. Best defence strategy start with review of documents. Cheque agreement, repayment acknlowledgement, chats, previous emails, bank records,emand calculation help defendants succesfully defend their position. Similarly, drawer can show proof that notice was not received in time. Facing complicated pending cheque bounce case? Consider taking second opinion on cheque bounce and NI Act cases. Chequebouncelawyer.com has been helping clients across india since 2014. Clients get help with understanding cheque bounce notices, cheque bounce complaint drafting, notice replies, court defence and settlement discussions. BK Singh reviews following points: His advice has always been practical becauseIndian law rewards facts. It does not reward panic reactions. Chequebouncelawyer.com assists clients from Delhi NCR, Delhi, New Delhi, Ghaziabad, Noida, Greater Noida, Gurugram, Faridabad, Meerut, Hapur, Lucknow, Kanpur, Prayagraj, Varanasi, Agra, Jaipur, Chandigarh, Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata, Ahmedabad and other Indian cities. Facing higher stage cheque bounce matter? Visit cheque bounce lawyer for Supreme Court page for help. Yes, if cheque bounced representing legally enforceable debt. Else accused can use defence that no amount was payable when cheque was presented for payment. Yes. Courts do not dismiss Section 138 NI Act only because cheque was designated as “security cheque”. Holder of cheque verifies that drawer was liable to pay on cheque presentation date. Courts have treated security cheque defence in facts dependent manner. If no legally enforceable debt exist when cheque was presented, that is the strongest defence. Other defences include cheque misuse, repayment, inflated demand, wrong format of notice, limitation cut-off, wrong party named in notice or drawer had no authority to issue cheque. Signing a blank cheque is like inviting legal risk. Drawer can defend such case if he proves that cheque was misused by holder or cheque was filled by holder beyond his authority. But facts and evidence should support defence story. Yes, if cheque represents legitimately recoverable dues from tenant. If landlord presents cheque alleging random amount without showing unpaid rent, damage or agreed charges, tenant can defend such case. You should review the cheque, bank memo, cheque amount requested, underlying agreement, payment history and notice timeline. Only after reviewing these facts, you should send a well drafted legal reply within the time available. Yes. Most cheque bounce matters settle even after filing complaints. Many settle before trial. Many settle during trial or in mediation. Some even settle at appellate stage. If you settle, ensure to get a written and lawful recording of the settlement. If found guilty in trial, punishment can extend to imprisonment for two years or fine which may extend to twice the cheque amount or both, at discretion of court. If someone is misusing your security cheque against which no dues were payable, you can send a reply to notice, collect evidence and fight the complaint. You can also assert legal rights against opposite party. Filing false complaint against opposite party is not a lawful solution. Avoid taking that route. Yes. Cheque bounce matters are often decided by first reply from drawer. Sending an emotional or rude reply will waive off some of your legal rights unintentionally. A well drafted cheque bounce notice reply can preserve your rights legally. Security cheque bounce criminal case in India depends on facts. It does not get decided simply because someone writes “security” on a cheque or says it in a conversation. If drawer had a debt which became payable and cheque was presented for the same, Section 138 applies. If cheque was misused for a liability which was never enforceable against drawer, he can fight the case. Ignore legal notices at your own risks. Sending careless admission in the hope that other party will go away is a big mistake. You do not need panic. You need focussed legal review early. Seek clarifications on security cheque related disputes, cheque bounce notice replies, complaint drafting, guidance on defence or settlement through chequebouncelawyer.com. Advocate BK Singh can help you understand the Indian laws around cheques practically. The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. This information may not reflect latest changes in law. It should not be used as a substitute for legal advice. Please consult a lawyer for specific advice on any issue.Security Cheque Bounce Criminal Case in India – Is Security Cheque Bounce a Criminal Case?
Summary
Why This Issue Matters in India in 2021
Quick Facts Box
Understanding the Core Legal Issue
Can Security Cheque Bounce Attract Section 138 NI Act?
“The words “security cheque” cannot in all cases and in every circumstance, absolve the drawer of his liability under Section 138 of the Act.”
“We hold that where a cheque is issued towards discharge of liability under a loan arrangement, the fact that the cheque was post dated does not take the matter outside Section 138…”
Legal Framework for Security Cheque Bounce Case in India
Who Needs This Guidance?
Step-By-Step Process In A Security Cheque Bounce Legal Action
Documents and Evidence Checklist
Timelines, Practical Delays and Decision Windows
Common Mistakes People Make
Risks of Ignoring a Security Cheque Bounce Notice
When Should You Consult a Cheque Bounce Lawyer For Security Cheque?
Why Is a Cheque Bounce Case Filed Under Section 138?
What Is The Punishment In Security Cheque Bounce Cases?
Can A Security Cheque Bounce Case Be Defended?
How Chequebouncelawyer.com Can Help
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is security cheque bounce criminal case in India?
2. Can security cheque bounce attract section 138?
3. What is the main defence in security cheque bounce case?
4. Is a blank security cheque valid for cheque bounce case?
5. Can landlord file cheque bounce case for security deposit cheque?
6. What should I do after receiving security cheque bounce notice?
7. Can we settle a security cheque bounce case?
8. What is the punishment for security cheque bounce?
9. Can I file false cheque bounce case complaint if someone misused my security cheque?
10. Should I consult lawyer before replying to security cheque bounce notice?
Final Thoughts
Disclaimer
There's no reason for concern. There is no difficult-to-understand legalese.
Someone who has helped many people with the same problems gives you clear, honest advice. We want to make the legal process easy to understand and use for everyone.
